Lessons from Procter & Gamble –Focus on Market Leadership

 

Getting profitable and staying profitable is how we help our clients, the critical element for all companies.  Being a market leader, while not an easy task, is certainly one way to help make that happen.  P&G has the largest lineup of leading brands in its industry, with 21 brands with over $1 billion in annual sales and another 19 brands generating about $500 million or more in annual sales.  In 2000, there were 10 brands over a Billion; today, they have 21.  During this period, the company’s revenue has doubled from $40 Billion to $80 Billion. 

 

Procter & Gamble is very clear on their objective to have superior products, not just in performance, but in consumer preference.  They have sharpened their focus on how to deliver this.  This sharpened focus has meant selling off or discontinuing a number of very successful brands, but brands that did not fit with an opportunity for global market leadership.

 

The company used to market a stable of brands and achieve market leadership through the combined sales.  For example, when I joined P&G in the early seventies, in laundry detergents, the company marketed Tide, Cheer, Bold, Gain, Duz, Dreft, Era, Liquid Tide, Ivory Snow and the first detergent, Oxydol.  There were probably several others as well that just don’t come to mind.  Combined, this provided market leadership.

 

However, it resulted in increased costs.  The brands competed against one another for sales force time, retailer promotions, shelf space, advertising, media time slots, in-store offers and most importantly, Procter & Gamble management attention.  As a Brand Manager, my task was to get a larger share of company effort so that I could increase my brand’s impact with consumers.  It was not uncommon for a great idea to be expended on one of the smaller brands and thus dilute its impact.  The company realized that it would be far better served to focus its efforts on the lead brands and make them clear market leaders.  The billion dollar brands are the result.

Today, Procter & Gamble has a very clear path for its mega brands to achieve market dominance.  All of the very best people, ideas, support and processes are given to one brand and not spread across multiple brands.  In fact, there has been an increasing tendency to “borrow” from one mega brand in one category to assist another in a separate category.

 

But what is the value of the Procter & Gamble experience for your business if you do not have a stable of billion dollar brands or are not the market leader?  How can you capitalize on the learnings from P&G’s experience?

 

Here are 5 tips learned from Procter, building the smaller brands or opening up new categories and industries for the company.

 

1.     Be choiceful in selecting the market / industry / geography in which you will compete.  Make certain that you have an opportunity to be able to gain a leadership position in the arena that you select, perhaps not immediately, but within a reasonable time frame.

 

2.     Focus your resources to build a solid base in one area and become successful before you move to additional areas.

 

3.     Hire and use “A” class people.  Your best investment will be in your people.  Skimp in other areas if needed since the great people will be able to over compensate.

 

4.     Take good care of your customers.  You would be surprised at how many companies we see that overlook their current customers in the drive to get new ones.

 

5.     Take advantage of consulting and contracting help to both capitalize on their expertise and keep your costs down overall.  This may sound self-serving, since we are consultants, but there is no substitute for experience.  We have used our P&G learning and knowledge to build substantial profitability for many companies

 

Market leadership brings with it many benefits that help companies get profitable and stay profitable.   We can help you.  Contact us anytime.

 Thanks.

 

John Maver
Founder & Managing Director of Moon & Stars Consulting
President Maver Management Group
(925) 648-7561
Maver Management

What’s the issue? Business planning or just doing?

The recession continues and more and more businesses are failing - failing and being forced out of business, failing enough to have significant losses despite large layoffs and a desperate focus on cost cutting or failing through having little idea of how to turn the business around and keep a meaningful cash flow.

What’s the issue? Is it too much planning or too much action?

Are they failing because they have spent so much time creating the mission, vision, objective, goals and measurements for their strategic business plan that the opportunities have passed them by? Or are they locked in to outdated plans, programs and spending? Or is it more a case of having leadership that is unable to cope with the realities of today’s dynamic marketplace?

On the other hand, is it because they do not have a basic business plan that they are following and are just winging it? In this case, everyone is going full speed, but not in the same direction, no matter what you may think and certainly not toward a specific goal.

Or worse still, is it because they are faced with analysis paralysis and actually doing nothing? This cause a company to seize up and the organization grinds to a halt.

Actually, the failing may be the result of some or all of these elements. Business plans are a MUST for every company. However, they need to be actionable. And they need to be acted upon, adjusted and acted upon again. They shouldn’t be binder thick. In fact, we recommend that they be kept to one or two pages. Otherwise, they are not read, used properly or followed.

What are you doing in your company? If your company is struggling, is it due to over-planning for the business with concentration on the theoretical plan and not taking the appropriate action? Or is it all action and no known overall plan. Clearly, it can’t be an either/or if you are going to survive in today’s economy. It is a reasoned combination of both planning and action.

Do you have a written business plan? Is it simple and understandable to all? Has it been communicated to others?

Are they taking action on it? Are you adapting the plan based on the ever new market feedback? Do your customers know what you are trying to do and the benefit in it for them? Are they supporting your direction?

What are the results and what needs to be changed?

So many companies are focused on cost cutting that they are not generating revenue that is desperately required for cash flow and support and also undermining all future efforts. Now, and when the economy turns, it is going to be the company with the successful plans put into action and market honed that will prosper.

Managing in today’s turbulent times isn’t easy so don’t think you can do this on your own. Get some help from experts who have been there before and can help lead you through the problems.

This can be a time for you and your company to actually prosper but you have to do it smartly.

Thanks.

John

John Maver
President
Maver Management Group
(925) 648-7561
Maver Management

Lessons from P&G - False reasons for not doing strategic planning

Procter & Gamble spends a considerable amount of time and effort in gathering the appropriate data and developing the right strategic plans that can be followed to maximize effectiveness in the market.  As a result, they have a significant number of billion dollar brands from their world-wide effort.  Yet, as we have studied many other companies across a broad range of industries, we find that many companies are reluctant to undertake the simple strategic planning process and thus are not achieving the results that they should.

Here are the 7 most common reasons given for not doing strategic planning.  You can see why these could be considered to be false reasons and just stand in the way of the company’s success.  The lessons from Procter & Gamble show how these may be false.

1 The CEO believes they already have a plan in their mind.

 Too often the CEO believes that there is already a strategic plan because they have a rough plan in their mind.  The difficulty is that this plan is generally not data based and worse still is not communicated well or understood by the rest of the organization.  As a result, the organization does the best that they are able but seldom in line with the CEO’s vision or plan.  Valuable resources in people and finances are not focused and wasted.  If you want the plan to work, write it down and share it broadly.  This only makes sense!

2  A belief that funds for planning are not available. 

This is a great misunderstanding and is based on a short term view.  The investment of funds to do a strategic plan properly is generally minimal. The ROI is generally considerable.  Once the expenditure is made, the benefits start quickly and the business and profitability grow.  This is an investment that will pay big dividends in so many ways.

3 Focusing on too many other projects.

One of the reasons that there are too many other projects is that there is no well-known and followed plan.  A strategic plan is not only what the company will do but what it will not do.  Focused effort leads to fewer false starts with less wasted effort and rework.  Productivity increases.  The employees are happier and have less stress, thereby reducing turnover.

4 A Belief that the market will change

Many companies put off strategic planning because they expect the market will change.  Of course, the market will change!  But the purpose of the plan is to manage that change and not be managed by it.  The right plan can help companies to take advantage of market changes and gain a competitive advantage over competitors who have done no planning.  Develop the plan and review it, altering it to capitalize on market changes.

5 Not sure how to proceed

Executives at companies are smart.  They clearly have the intelligence to do strategic planning.  However, in many cases they just don’t have the training in strategic planning and should be active participants instead of facilitators.  Having a simple process like the one that we use at Moon & Stars allows the executives to lead the planning without disrupting the daily business.

6 Team doesn’t want to do it

Teams generally do not get involved in strategic planning.  They are just provided with new ways of doing business and of course there is always a resistance to change.  They need to be “pulled” into executing the plans.  At Procter & Gamble, all are involved and so they believe that they have a vested interest in the plans and an understanding of the benefits.

7 Takes too much time/ Waste of time

Actually, the strategic planning process can be built upon current data and knowledge and accomplished within normal work effort.  Almost immediately, it will become clear as to the activities that can be eliminated due to negative or low returns.  This frees up the time to do the planning and the activities which will have a long term positive effect.

Conclusion

Strategic planning is generally misunderstood and as a result these and other false reasons are held that prevent companies from getting the benefit of the planning.  We at Moon & Stars have had the opportunity to learn, not only how to do strategic planning, but to assist clients to develop plans that are specifically tailored to their situation.  The time and investment are minimal and the results are significant.  Procter & Gamble makes this process a common activity in which everyone participates.

What is holding you back from getting the business results that you might achieve?

 Thanks,

John

John Maver
Founder and Managing Director of Moon & Stars Consulting
President Maver Management Group
(925) 648-7561
Maver Management

Lessons from P&G – Making the Number

How’s business?  Are you and your company on track to deliver the promised results for the year? 

 

Do you require a boost in performance?

While this is written to address the companies who are not at desired levels, the basic message holds true for those that are doing well and want to continue the progress.

We are entering the last quarter of the calendar year and incremental effort may be required.  At Procter & Gamble, this was the time to call in the experienced help.  It wasn’t just the senior management.  It was getting advice and assistance from others who had fresh ideas and could identify opportunities.  They had the experience to know what would work and what could deliver the number without increasing the resources.

In today’s world companies generally have the financing required and of course the product ideas.  It is the experienced management talent that is often missing. That was a big difference compared to Procter & Gamble where there was an abundance of highly trained and experience management.

So what can a company do today?  In some instances, the C level executive has the skills but not the bandwidth.  In others both the skilled experience and the bandwidth are missing.  In either case, there is just something missing and there is a gap between the required result and the ability to deliver it.  How does a company close this gap without the time and great expense of searching for and hiring full time the required expertise?

 

That is why I am writing this article!

The reason that we created Moon & Stars Consulting was to assist other companies to have access to the management experience that can be used in the short term to quickly fill this gap and be able to make the number.

How do we assist companies?  Working with the company team, we determine the key challenges and opportunities to deliver the number.  Then using our experience and perhaps that of other consultants with the strong Procter management training, we create the strategies, plans and the execution that will drive the marketplace results.

We know that this works because we have had success with hundreds of clients in addition to our Procter & Gamble businesses.

It is also very cost efficient, since you are getting significant expertise and only need use it in the short term until the plans are in place and generating success.  Not only are we really skilled at what we do, we are fun folks with whom to work.

For some of you, this may seem simplistic, but the ideas are important.  We would just like to support your efforts.  Let us know how we can help.  In any case please stay in touch.  We value our friends.

John Maver
Founder & Managing Director of Moon & Stars Consulting
President Maver Management Group
(925) 648-7561
Maver Management

Lessons from Procter & Gamble – Branding

 

 All companies and executives know about branding but many are not familiar with how to use it or how it can affect the bottom line.  Over the years P&G has become a master of this and has many multi-billion dollar brands as a result.  A strong branding strategy can increase the awareness of a company’s products in such a way that establishes strong feelings and reactions and a favorable view towards the company as a whole.  Successfully out-branding your competitors is a continuous battle for the hearts and minds of your customers.  The proposition your brand strategy makes must be very compelling, attractive and unique among competitive offerings.  Done correctly, branding is that extra margin that companies achieve over generics or even store brands.

 

Building on the inherent values of a brand should be the core of any branding strategy.  Winning brand strategies starts with top-notch research.  Your target customer will determine your success.  Research with consumers will identify needs and then it is up to your branding to make the fit of your offerings fill those needs.  Consistency is a key here, since all aspects of the branding must fit together.

Make it your mission to get as detailed information as possible on their age, gender, income, shopping habits (online and off) and anything else of relevance you can determine. If you’re targeting a business market, these criteria will differ, depending on the industry. Understanding your target market and what they want is key to developing a winning brand.

 
The research will lead to the brand promise.  It states the benefit of buying and using your company’s products or services.  A great deal of time and effort at Procter & Gamble is spent on finding the right promise and making it competitive so that it stands out in its industry or category.   They know that it must be specific because specific is exponentially more memorable.

Creating a positive emotional association in your market for your product or service is key. It can create want and desire by the mere mention of your brand, product or service name. Needless to say, that’s powerful. For instance, the mere mention of Tide detergent makes buyers think of clean clothes. 

To create a brand promise that creates such emotional connections, it should be:

1. Grounded in the brand’s core values.
2. Clearly relevant and engaging to your target market.
3. Able to create some sort of positive emotional attachment beyond just being “good”.
4. Adaptable to the business climate in terms of how the basic promise is presented although the promise itself does not change.
5. Continually reinforced and consistent across advertising and marketing.

 

It is clear that branding can make a significant difference in the success of a brand and a company.  Without intentional effort, unintentional positioning will occur and that can spell disaster.

 

The Moon & Stars team have had long experience and great success over the years with branding and have developed solid procedures to help clients.  We are happy to share these with you.

 

Thanks,

 John

John Maver
Founder and Managing Director of Moon & Stars Consulting
President Maver Management Group
(925) 648-7561
Maver Management

Lessons from Procter & Gamble – Leaders

John Smale, an ex CEO of Procter & Gamble, passed away last week. He was a remarkable leader and made some very significant contributions to P&G. He also took leadership positions from the Board at General Motors, where he turned the company around and revamped it. He was active in his community, restructuring the City of Cincinnati and then working for youth education among other activities.

During my 23 years at P&G and in the subsequent 18, there have been 8 CEO’s at the company. In addition to John Smale, the most memorable ones for me are John Pepper, Howard Morgans, Ed Harness, Ed Artzt and A.G. Lafley. They all made substantial contributions to the company. While some have written books, the important learnings from each have been captured in internal memos and have been shared broadly across the company. All are different and have varied skills, but there are some commonalities. This is not surprising, given Procter & Gamble’s policy of promotion from within and the fact that all of these men had years of training, learning from each other, as well as from many others who helped shape their careers.

They all exhibited strengths in the following:

Values
They all were committed to trying to do the right thing in all they did. Doing the right thing is much more than a cliché, since who would attempt to do the wrong thing per se. In this case, it is seeking to do what is right instead of what is most profitable or most expedient or most popular. The clearest example of this is the removal of Rely tampons from the market when there was an initial suggestion that extended use of the product might be associated with toxic shock syndrome. The company took the product off the shelves immediately until there could be absolute, conclusive proof that it had no impact. The cost was in the millions of dollars and took P&G out of the feminine protection business for several years, but it was the right thing to do and drove home that message and value to all employees.

Focus on the consumer
P&G has maintained a relentless focus on the consumer throughout its years as the global leader in Consumer Packaged Goods (CPG). A.G. Lafley wrote “Everything begins and ends with the consumer. If you focus on the consumer and what your brand is doing to serve the consumer, you will win most of the time". P&G was the first company to conduct deliberate, database driven,, consumer market research. This forward-thinking approach enables the company to improve consumer understanding, anticipate needs and respond with products that improve their everyday life. P&G also was one of the first companies to formally respond to consumers by establishing a Consumer Relations department. Several years ago, P&G realized that though it talked to a lot of people, it wasn’t really hearing them. It has overcome this barrier by taking one of the industry’s more traditional market research organizations and turning it into a consumer-understanding powerhouse and consumer-insight generator. By investing more than a billion dollars in consumer-understanding research between 2002 and 2007 and conducting research with more than 4 million consumers a year, P&G has moved away from traditional, behind-the-mirror focus groups to more immersive research techniques. This leads to richer consumer insights, which helps identify innovation opportunities that are often missed by traditional research.


Dedication to product superiority and to superior products
The CEO’s are dedicated to leading the company with a product philosophy of “We will provide branded products and services of superior quality and value that improve the lives of the world's consumers. As a result, consumers will reward us with leadership sales, profit, and value creation, allowing our people, our shareholders, and the communities in which we live and work to prosper.” It is not enough just to have product superiority. The company must have products that are superior. Hence, the development and sale of the first shortening for baking and cooking. The first detergent. The first workable disposable diaper. The first two in one shampoo/conditioner. Despite the pressures to deliver above average quarterly earnings, the CEOs have consistently over invested in R&D, compared to most companies.

Commitment to people
The “people” philosophy of these men in simple terms is “Recruit the best. Train and develop all. Promote from within. Treat each fairly.” As a result, P&G has had some outstanding long term employees and many others have left the company to lead other significant operations. The company believes in its people, even in departure. Having been part of the first worldwide global initiative of reductions in force, I was treated extremely fairly and with great respect by my Cincinnati management. As a former CEO, Richard R. Dupree said in 1947, "If you leave us our money, our buildings, and our brands, but take away our people, the Company will fail. But if you take away our money, our buildings, and our brands, but leave us our people, we can rebuild the whole thing in a decade."

Worldwide view and globalization
P&G has long had an international business. In fact, I was part of it in the Canadian operation, several times. The company really got serious when it appointed Ed Artzt as President of P&G International and then promoted him to become CEO of the entire company. Today P&G has 24 billion dollar brands, most with a global sales base. As current CEO Bob McDonald says, “Our objective is to touch and improve lives. Why would we stop with operating in only some countries? Our business is driven by demographics and economics--you have to go where the babies are born, where the households form, where the incomes are rising--and they’re growing a lot faster outside of the U.S.” P&G has product usage with 4 Billion customers and the majority of their products are made outside of the USA. They have established a worldwide research and development network, with research hubs in the United States, Europe, Japan and Latin America.

There have been many tributes to John Smale, deservedly. John Pepper, himself a favorite CEO of the employees, said, "John brought together wisdom and courage, concern for people, and commitment to the long term in a manner I've never seen exceeded." "The man's character was defined by all the things character is defined by: his wisdom, his courage, his persistent commitment to doing what's right for the longer term -- absolutely right down the line. Never compromising.”

Procter & Gamble has had superb leaders. The impact that they have had on the company pales by the impact that they have had on the employees.

Thanks,

John

John Maver
President
Maver Management Group
(925) 648-7561
Maver Management

Lessons from Procter & Gamble – Downsizing, Rightsizing, RIFs

Most companies have been faced with the need to cut costs over the past several years and many people and jobs have been eliminated from the workforce. You will note that we have the highest level of unemployment as one of the impacts. The personnel reductions have come under the heading of downsizing, rightsizing or just reductions in force (RIFs). The net result in addition to lower costs is a substantial change in the way that companies have to operate.

At the same time, technology has made tremendous progress and we now have available significant capabilities that never existed before. The idea has been that companies can do much more with much less. Believe it or not, when the first computers were being introduced, there was an expectation that the work week would shrink to less than a day a week. Computers would do the rest. You know personally from your now extended work weeks that this was not the case and was, at best, a wild dream. And yet companies expected that technology could overcome the impact of the lost personnel.

Procter & Gamble is no exception. In 1993, well before this became common practice, P&G undertook a worldwide cut back in personnel under the heading of strengthening global effectiveness. SGE was designed to streamline work processes, drive out non value-added costs, eliminate duplication and speed productivity through a leaner organization. Initially, it was directed at the manufacturing operations but the idea quickly spread to the rest of the company. Up to 10,000 people/jobs were eliminated. The objective, just as it has been the objective of most companies, was same or greater productivity with less cost.

Unfortunately, that hasn’t happened. It didn’t happen at P&G and it isn’t happening with many other companies. Certainly, some aspects worked as expected. But in many cases, the people and jobs were eliminated, yet the work required remained.

This did produce a short term profit bump after the reorganization costs were passed through as a “one time hit” to earnings. However, as Stephen Covey outlined in his book the 7 Habits of Effective People, the golden goose was maimed if not killed outright. The reductions in force often targeted the higher salaried, longer term employees. Companies lost years of very valuable experience and expertise. As a result many companies faced substantial redesign, slower process, business and profit losses.

What made it worse for many companies is that the personnel reductions came on a “chain saw” basis and not a “surgical” basis. This means that cuts were made across the board. The result was reductions in one department greatly affected what was left in other departments or functions, to the detriment of the business. This has led to renewed needs for reorganizations and then further rightsizing. In fact, that is exactly what has happened at Procter. They have had several full company reorganization plans. They have offered several waves of early retirement and outplacement packages to employees around the globe.

What’s the lesson? Clearly it is taking the long view. It is an in depth understanding of what is really required to operate profitably and then providing the technology and human resources required to deliver the objectives. Short term solutions just don’t work. Second, it means focus. It means being choiceful on what activities are really required to operate profitably and to achieve the corporate goals. Other activities that are just nice to do, have to be eliminated. Finally, it is deciding on what data is required to operate. Most companies are buried under an overload of information. Layers of the organization are employed to develop the data, analyze it and interpret it and then try to find meaningful actionable conclusions. The loss of the experience and expertise caused by the cuts has led to much of this wheel spinning over-analysis.

If your company is experiencing “sludge” in your operations and slower speed to market, you might consider relooking at some of the experience that was cut out in the rightsizing. Interestingly, many companies are hiring back ex-employees as consultants at a higher cost to do the same job that they originally did.

Since we have had experience both at Procter & Gamble with SGE and similar programs at other companies, we can help you. Just contact us.

Thanks,

John

John Maver
President
Maver Management Group
(925) 648-7561
Maver Management

Lessons from Procter & Gamble - What is a brand?

Procter & Gamble is well known for its brands. As we have said in earlier articles, many people mistakenly believe that a brand is a product. While that is in part correct, it isn’t the whole story. A brand is an image in the customer’s mind. The thoughts customers have about products are brand impressions. These brand impressions are the major influences on the purchase decision. Customers form impressions of products every time they come in contact with them. Once products or companies are out in the market, you already have a brand, whether you want it or not. The only issue left to consider is what kind of brand you want to have.

Brands are inferred, not implied. Branding isn’t something companies do to customers. After experiencing a product or a company, a customer has an impression of that product and decides how to "brand" that product in their own mind. In other words, a brand isn't what a marketer says it is. It is what a customer thinks it is.

However, companies can do a lot to influence the impression that customer/consumers have about them and their brands. Often we think of brands from big companies like Nike and Coke who use the brute-force of mass marketing to "impress" their message on people. Brute force is becoming a less and less effective method for branding, because it's gotten harder and harder to tell today's discerning customers how to think.

Only a very few companies, like Nike and Coke, can afford to brand with brute force. Now the method of choice seems to be primarily via some form of social media in addition to the traditional advertising/marketing vehicles. Companies like ThoughtLabs specialize in bringing customers closer to their clients.

Branding isn't just something that applies to big, national companies with large advertising budgets. For all types of persuasion, thought is always a prelude to action No matter how the product is marketed; it all must start with positioning. It is in this effort that companies attempt to set their desired image in the minds of the customer. This is key!

People's thoughts and beliefs drive their actions. The goal of the interactions with a customer is to encourage them to create a brand impression in their mind that motivates them to act in a way that helps my product. By focusing on what they think, I am forced to pay attention to everything I do that affects what they think about me and my product. I can't just make an independent decision about what I want my brand to be and create beautiful advertising that "declares" what my brand is -- I have to orchestrate all of the experiences they have with my product in a way that encourages them to create the right brand impression in their mind.

So . . . what do you want your customers to think about your products . . . and you?

If you have not clearly defined the positioning for your company or its products or the results are not meeting expectations, we can help. Contact us.

Thanks

John

This is one of a series of articles that share some of the learnings from twenty three years in marketing at Procter & Gamble.

John Maver
President
Maver Management Group(
925) 648-7561
Maver Management

Lessons from Procter & Gamble – Persuasively Selling Their Brands

There are many different selling formats and yet all of them that have been successful are based on the problem – solution idea. First, crystalize the problem that the buyer is facing and get agreement to the problem and then offer your solution, which is of course based on your brands. At Procter & Gamble this has been honed to a fine art by salespeople. They call it the Persuasive Selling Format. At Clorox, it is called SIERE. At other companies it may be called the 5 Selling Steps. But they all are virtually identical.

All sales people have these 5 steps memorized and I can still recall them now after 30 plus years. In fact I can recall when I skipped a step and lost the sale too. Here is how it works.

Summarize the Situation – After the opening ice breaker chat, identify a problem that either has been identified by the buyer on a previous call or is generic to their situation. You can also share key facts, information or industry trends to set up the discussion. It is important that the problem be easy to agree with and not be controversial. You do not want to spend a lot of time on the problem. You need to sell the solution. This set up gets the buyer nodding in agreement with you and hopefully you can keep that happening as you work down to the order.

State the Idea - Tell them a brief statement of the idea that you are recommending as a solution to their problem in a way that makes it compelling. Keep this brief and get a quick nod that they understand your idea. They may not agree with it YET but they must at least understand it.

Explain How It Works – Once you’ve clearly stated the proposition, provide details of the recommendation. Typically, this includes information about the product, the promotion, the support being provided, the pricing and the execution timing and logistics. Provide the information in “layers”. That means, give them the summarized version of each element of the information and if they require more provide what is necessary. Many, many sales have been lost by clouding the issue in the buyer’s mind at this point or providing so many details that they tune out and you lose them.

Reinforce Key Benefits – What’s in it for them? How does this really solve the problem they are having or the opportunity upon which they want to capitalize? What are the key reasons that they should accept your idea and recommendation and move forward? Experience shows that there are always three solid reasons to offer to the buyer. That provides enough strength and doesn’t cloud the issue with weak support. It causes you and the buyer to focus and be memorable. The buyer should be nodding agreement to each of the benefits as they understand them.

Suggest Easy Next Steps –The Close, the Close!!!! The most effective method to work into the Close is to suggest an easy next step that makes the buyer continue to nod agreement. To some extent this calls for an assumptive close, where you assume the buyer is going to agree with the basic proposal and now you are ironing out some small detail. It can be as simple as asking, “Do you want this Wednesday or Thursday? Do you want this in red or blue?” Once you have agreement to that easy next step just write up the order.

This works. Take it from my personal experience and the experience of tens of thousands of others as well. This doesn’t apply only to selling products to buyers at companies. It applies to all selling situations. I know that the technical folks will say that the B2B sale is different. Yes it is, but the same idea works there as well. I have used this technique in many different situations.
If you want more information on this lesson from Procter & Gamble or on any of the others in this series, contact us. We will be happy to help you.

Thanks,

John

John Maver
President
Maver Management Group
(925) 648-7561
Maver Management

Lessons from Procter & Gamble – “Stick to your knitting” – Core Competencies

As you might gather from the title, people at P&G didn’t make this statement in so many words. In fact, these words came from my mother when she wanted me to concentrate on what I was doing and not get distracted. But the meaning was clear from my years at Procter & Gamble, as well.

In Procter and business terms, it means to understand your core competencies and stick to them. Don’t get sidetracked and move away from where your true competitive advantage lies. You can quickly recall many companies that strayed and suffered great losses as a result. Gatorade anyone?

Just so that we have a common understanding of the definition of Core Competency it is: A unique ability that a company acquires from its founders or develops and that cannot be easily imitated. Core competencies are what give a company one or more competitive advantages, in creating and delivering value to its customers in its chosen field.

While P&G is clearly known as a marketing/branding/advertising company, it has other core talents as well. The primary core is the people. Great care and effort is expended in identifying and recruiting top candidates in all functions. Then, strong training and development programs are put in place for all, since the company is a promote from within and the future of the company rests heavily on the new hires. They state that people are their most valuable asset and they mean it.

The second core competency is in research and development. The company has “overspent” in this area for decades. In fact, at one time, there were more PhDs per square foot in the R&D labs than at any other place in the world.

The combination of these three elements results in a core competency of bringing superior products to market. Superior is defined as not only breakthrough, but also better meeting customer needs. Breakthrough products include the first shortening (Crisco), the first detergent (Oxydol/Tide), the first workable disposable diaper (Pampers) and many more. The company has been and remains the premier consumer packaged goods company as a result.

This is not meant to be a self-serving article, since I spent more than two decades at P&G. It is meant to help other companies spend the time to clearly define their core competencies and then build strategies and business plans that capitalize on them.

Having been in business for more than 4 decades and as a consultant for more than 12 years, I have seen many companies that have failed to find their core and their efforts achieve less than optimum results, at best. Some do not change and are no longer in business. Resources both human capital and financial are scarce. The dilution of those resources on key projects as well as the lack of focus often causes major damage to companies.

If you need help in identifying your core competencies or creating the plans that will make you successful, contact us. We have a lot of experience as a business acceleration company.

Thanks

John

John Maver
President
Maver Management Group
(925) 648-7561
Maver Management

Four Fatal Flaws of Business Planning

The effective development of business plans is drawing a lot of attention these days. In no way does this mean that companies are becoming more effective in their business planning or business plan creation. Many companies claim to be doing regular business planning but most are not. Executives and managers continue to make fundamental mistakes that undermine otherwise well intentioned strategy formulation efforts.

Here are four fatal flaws that consistently creep into business planning processes that if avoided, can significantly improve both the process and the results.

Skipping Rigorous Analysis Before Starting On The Actual PlanMany executives and managers believe their business experience and knowledge base alone equips them with all the information they need to conduct effective business planning. This belief is almost always untrue and serves only to undermine the kind of critical thinking from which truly creative strategies are born. This becomes complicated, since most planning is done by a team and all participants come with preconceived notions and differing sets of data on which to base the plans. Having an experienced facilitator with success in business planning is critical. A good business planning process takes full advantage of the numerous tools of strategic analysis to gain key insights regarding how the industry is evolving, how competitors are changing positions, and where an individual firm's sources of competitive advantage lie. Don’t ever overlook the critical role of defining the company’s Core Purpose and Core Values before you start.

Believing Strategy Can Be Built in a DayMany executive teams earnestly believe that effective strategies can be identified, explored, and agreed upon during abbreviated offsite meetings where the main driver of the agenda is the timing of snack breaks. While offsite meetings are useful forums in which to share information and address key issues, meetings should be adequately timed over days or weeks if necessary, so that sufficient preparation, review and discussion can occur before and during the event. We have found that breaking the process into multiple sessions, each with assigned pre-work, allow participants to reflect on the work being done in less pressured surroundings and provide clearer input to the plans.

Failing to Link Business Planning with Strategic ExecutionAccording to a recent survey, execution overall and strategy execution in particular hold the first and second positions when it comes to "top issues" in executive's minds. Executing strategy requires the work of the entire organization, whereas business planning only requires the top team. One of the greatest challenges of the planning team is the ability to link their work with ongoing strategy execution. Strategic success demands a simultaneous view of planning and doing. Managers must be thinking about executing even as they are formulating the plan. They also must find a means of effectively cascading the corporate plan down into the various functions and business units so that all of the work is aligned.

Dodging Strategy Review MeetingsBusiness plans quickly become obsolete when there is no activity in place to keep them alive. Worse, managers sometimes feel freed from execution accountability when reviews are continually rescheduled or dropped from the calendar altogether. Successful businesses have made their business process a continuous and dynamic one. This is a more realistic approach than the once-a-year planning meeting that still dominates many corporate business planning efforts. The most direct way to maintain a consistent focus on strategy is to schedule and hold regular strategy review meetings. At the end of the business plan formulation, managers should establish a strategic governance process where business plan review meetings are scheduled a year in advance. In the meetings, with each of the strategies and tactics having an owner responsible for it, there is accountability. The measures that have been developed provide a strong basis for review of the success of the pan and what may need to be modified to keep on track.

Business planning tied to strong execution is a winning combination. Our clients are enjoying this success. How may we assist you?

Thanks

John

John Maver
President
Maver Management Group
(925) 648-7561
Maver Management

Turnaround Management – Tips that work

Is your company in a “turnaround” condition? The common definition of a turnaround is very broad. It is basically about improving performance from one state to a better one. Being in this situation can cover more than just those companies that are about to go under. It can also be companies that have great opportunities for growth ahead of them, but need to change the way they do business in order to capitalize on them. While there are common lessons that apply to all, in this article we will focus on turnarounds from a negative position.

In the recent economic climate, we have become accustomed to companies struggling, with many going out of business. They haven’t been able to control their costs effectively or create the sources of revenue that will sustain the company. The majority of respected surveys put the success rate of turnarounds in these situations at between 20% and 35%, depending on the definition of under-performance and success. Those with turnaround experience know that turnaround situations are usually highly stressful and, if unsuccessful, very poorly rewarded.

Yet, they offer some excellent insights on what is important for a new CEO to consider. Clearly, there are factors that are unique to certain situations but in general these seven factors have led to success in most turnaround situations for troubled companies. For those companies who are not in turnaround mode but need business acceleration, there are some gold nuggets in here too.

1. Identify the real problem.
There are two generic reasons. Either something major went wrong for a short time, usually loss of a dominant customer or a dramatic market change; or something minor went wrong for a long time, usually poor understanding of customer or product profitability, that led to misguided allocation of capital and resources. Given the economic climate, it is tempting to blame market changes when things go wrong. That may also be true. What matters is the need to establish what went wrong and fix it.

2. Take control of time.
Senior teams, and particularly new CEOs, experience relentless demands on their time from all stakeholder groups from the Board, down through the banks, suppliers and customers. At the same time, management is constantly harried by a series of apparently urgent tasks, each of which is critical in its own way. The CEO needs to create breathing space for actually working on the business operation as a whole. While there are the fires to fight, there is also a necessity to protect the time that they and their team need to think, understand the problems in the business, formulate the plan, and implement it.

3. Get the finances under control.
Creating a bottom-up budget and making the team accountable for every part of income and spending. In addition to problems of solvency and profitability, most companies in turnaround situations have issues with liquidity. Whereas profitability can be addressed internally by sensible planning and performance management, liquidity usually requires external support from financiers, ranging from payment holidays through to cash injections. Sources will need to be reassured that there exists a viable business both in the short and mid-term, and that they are not throwing good money after bad. This liquidity brings breathing space that allows management to make calm, rational decisions that support long term survival and profitability.

4. Make promises you know you can keep.
In a turnaround situation, all of the stakeholders are concerned: employees, shareholders, banks, creditors, business partners, customers and suppliers. Increasing their confidence is critical to making any progress. Management has to be proactive and make a series of promises, which it knows it can keep. Hitting these checkpoints is the most effective tool management has to build its credibility.

5. Upgrade the executive team.
New plans almost always require a new team that is committed and able to execute the plan. Seldom is there a dramatic change in the fortunes of a company without a corresponding change in the senior team. This means at least two or three changes in senior personnel and that started with the change in CEO. It should be done quickly and bringing in senior consultants with specific experience is an excellent short term aid.

6. Simplify
Complexity is a double-edged sword in turnarounds. Companies often get into trouble when they take on too much and when they are in trouble they try extra benefits to get out of what they are doing. When resources and time are constrained, the business needs to concentrate on doing a small number of things well. This can mean reducing product lines, cutting or selling business units, outsourcing business processes or numerous other simplifications depending on the situation. The process of simplification needs to go far enough to give the remaining activities the focus of management time and investment required to do them well.

As you are reading this article, you might think that all of these tips are common sense and relatively obvious. However, all of them are also easy to dismiss, overlook or delay. DON”T!!

Let us know how we can assist you. We have experience across a broad range of industries and turnaround situations.

Thanks,

John

John Maver
President
Maver Management Group
(925) 648-7561
Maver Management

Business New Year’s Resolutions

It’s a new year. A new quarter. A new month. And you have enthusiastically thought about how you will make this new time so much better for your company and for you personally. You have a clean slate upon which to write. Well, as they said in that car rental commercial, “Not exactly”. There are a number of carryovers from last year, quarter and month, right?

In fact, it is the carryovers and habits set before that are the major causes of new resolutions and plans not being put in motion or carried out.

Unfortunately, the thoughts are just in your head and unless they are written down in the form of a plan and shared with your organization, the chance of them actually happening is virtually zero.

There must be a concrete change in order to alter the course of events. If you keep on doing the same things, you will keep on getting the same results. It’s not just the definition of insanity; it is what happens to most businesses.

The most effective change is the creation of an updated strategic plan. It can be a plan created from scratch or one that is updated and modified to take into account the current business and industry environment. The Institute for Strategic Planning has found that 73% of companies do not have a written plan that is known throughout the company. No wonder that business continues as it always has.

This is the moment to invest the resources and time to put those new thoughts down in a plan and capitalize on the opportunities in front of you. Many see this as tedious and unproductive effort. Yes, it can be if not done properly or the plan is not acted upon. It needs to have assigned responsibility with measures that cause accountability and retooling of the plans based on in market responses.

Have you done this with your company yet? If not, what is stopping you? You don’t have to be the CEO, although that clearly would help. You can put this into action at any level and your success will attract others to you.

If you need a format, we have a simple one that has proven to work effectively across a broad range of industries. If you need help using it or whatever other format you choose, please contact us. We are experts at this type of work.

Just get started before the slate fills up with old carryovers.

Thanks.

John

John Maver
President
Maver Management Group
(925) 648-7561
Maver Management